Error loading player: No playable sources found
FVC2435
Valuation Performance Framework Update
Date
October 30, 2024
$49
Standard Price
This product is also available as part of the following products:
This includes sessions from the conference: 2024 AICPA & CIMA Forensic & Valuation Services Conference
This session will provide an update on the efforts in place to draft the Valuation Performance Framework (VPF) (provisional name) which was formally known as the Mandatory Performance Framework(MPF). The discussion will focus on the changes that were necessary in order to construct a framework (VPF) that will support best practices within the valuation profession from the framework that supported the Certified in Intangibles and Entity Valuations (CEIV) credential (MPF).
Learning Objectives
- Identify changes that were necessary to transition the MPF to the VPF.
- Recognize how VPF's guidance on 'how much' work should be done helps to ensure transparent and auditable conclusions of value.
Speakers
Mark O. Smith, JD/CPA
Director, AICPA
Austin J. Lee, CPA/ABV
Principal, BDO USA
General
Related Products
Financial Valuation Applications and Models Text - New 5th Edition
Hitchner's new 5th edition of _Financial Valuation Applications and Models_ is now out. There is a plethora of new concepts, models, data, applications, etc. If you want to learn a lot in 50 minutes, then attend this session…
Can Virtual Mentors Revive Our Pipeline?
The global COVID-19 pandemic has proven that our industry not only survives but thrives in a hybrid work environment…
Ethical Vigilance: Recognizing Red Flags and Equipping Staff with Professional Integrity in Client Interactions
Navigating ethical considerations is not just important; it is the cornerstone of our profession's integrity and reputation…
Market Approach - Using General Market Multiples and Adjusting For Company Characteristics
Many individuals won't use the market approach because they can't find good comparable company transactions. We don't use the same consideration when establishing our discount rate in the Income approach so why can't we use the same approach by looking at general multiples and adjusting for risk…
