Litigation matters often have a need for multiple experts with varying skillsets and expertise. These experts are often relying on the same data and information but viewing it from a different perspective. There is often a need for experts to rely on each other’s testimony as well. This session will explore how two experts look at the same data differently as well as exploring the risks of varying assumptions and reliance on another expert’s work.
Identify key issues that may be interpreted differently and how to recognize and reconcile the different positions.
Assess the key drivers of opinion differences and evaluate the impact on expert opinion conclusions and positions of counsel.